tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094731596169096992.post1654176381993272264..comments2024-03-28T08:15:09.715-04:00Comments on The Accidental Taxonomist: Taxonomy TrendsHeather Heddenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16424216206886861070noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094731596169096992.post-56163581170945317962021-06-24T08:22:52.687-04:002021-06-24T08:22:52.687-04:00Thanks, A lot for sharing your great information I...Thanks, A lot for sharing your great information I love your blog post, you have shared with me your amazing tactics. Keep It Up!!!<br /><br />Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9094731596169096992.post-47163163739000752662021-05-09T06:39:40.274-04:002021-05-09T06:39:40.274-04:00From the blog I get that, there are three main cam...From the blog I get that, there are three main camps: taxonomies, thesauri, and ontologies. Traditionally, these three vocabulary systems do not interchange or co-exist very well. Heather Hedden, expresses the growing interest for systems that do indeed support two camps. For example, taxonomies and thesauri, or taxonomies and ontologies.<br /><br />The reason for the growth of interest is because some software integrates new or existing vocabulary into user interest in ontologies and knowledge graphics/charts. Not only would a duel camp enable integration, but it also offers increased interoperability between organizations.<br /><br />The introduction and interest in ontologies, is that it shifts/ expands perspective. For example the difference between terms and concepts. Hedden describes it as; terms are seen as “a string of texts, but concepts are ideas that have various labels.” I believe there are more relationships and perspectives to be explored with concepts – which adds to the heighten interest and flexibility of ontologies.AV Johnhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00646610576232322779noreply@blogger.com